Here’s our backstory:
When Leah was born, we noticed that her left eye seemed to
be a bit swollen. A pediatrician at the hospital commented on a “little
assymetry” in her face, but we knew that no newborn has a perfectly shaped
head, and hers seems consistent with that. We expected the swelling in her left
eye to go away within a few days, but it never did. We mentioned it to our
pediatrician at Leah’s first appointment, within days of her birth, but we
still assumed it was nothing to worry about. At her two week visit, however, it
hadn’t gotten better. In fact, the swelling now seemed to be affecting her
forehead a little more than her eye. Our pediatrician said it was most likely
swelling from birth, and could still go away on its own. She did say it could
also be a congenital ptosis, which is a swelling of the eyelid that would have
to be corrected with surgery, or a developing hemangioma, which would be
apparent after about a month and would last until Leah was five or so. Both
options seemed just awful to me, and she set us up with information about a
pediatric ophthalmologist in Syracuse to rule both out. She did also say that
it could be a premature fusing of the skull, but that was quite rare. I
remember she used the word “craniosynostosis” though I immediately forgot it
because I dismissed that as an option when she said that it was rare. I still
assumed it would go away on its own.
Over the next weeks, I kept watching her eye with much
trepidation to see the first signs of an emerging hemangioma. I did a fair bit
of online research about hemangiomas, but without seeing one on her face I
couldn’t be convinced that’s what she had. I did google “swollen forehead in
newborns” but came up with nothing—mostly reiterations that all babies have
funny-shaped heads and strange bumps and flat spots which will take care of
themselves with time. At one point, I came upon another mention of
craniosynostosis, but it was accompanied by photos of babies with elongated
heads at the tops or at the back—nothing at all like Leah’s forehead. So I
again dismissed it.
A month after Leah was born, we went to a friend’s camp on
the lake to celebrate July 4. I brought my camera and took several photos of
her in a flag dress on her dad’s lap. That evening, when I was downloading the
photos onto the computer, I noticed that her forehead was really swollen on the
left hand side, and for the first time, I though that maybe this wasn’t typical
and that we should worry after all. I made another appointment with our
pediatrician for the next day, then went back to the computer and searched “craniosynostosis”
again. This time, I began to read that there are actually different types of
the defect, and after a few clicks, I came upon this photo:
He called us back within an hour and gave us an informal
diagnosis: right coronal craniosynostosis. He explained that it is officially
diagnosed by CT scan, but that he felt sure from the photo that she had this.
He asked us to come to Philadelphia to meet with us the next week. At that
first meeting, he put his hands on her head and confirmed his initial
diagnosis, and gave us two options for treatment: the traditional CVR (cranial
vault reconstruction) or distraction surgery. CVR would be done when Leah was
about 10 months old, while distraction would be done at about 3 months. We also
met with Dr. Heuer, a neurosurgeon who is part of the “cranio” team at CHOP,
and felt after talking with him that we wanted to choose the distraction
surgery (read more about it on the left…). We tentatively scheduled the
surgery, and a return visit for a CT scan in mid-August.
No comments:
Post a Comment